Post by Raging Rachel on Aug 7, 2009 3:53:30 GMT -5
So, which side do you fight for and why?
All countries except U.S.: Good
1. more folks recieve medical care, but have to wait in long lines.
2. health care is free of charge.
3. In a way, It's fairer.
4. The treatment often lacks in quality because this is the government you are talking about and they like to spend as little as possible.
U.S.: good
1. Ill individuals doesn't have to wait in line, but not everyone receive health care
2. Because of national health care people rush to the states for operations and medical attention.
3. The government doesn't dictate your life and health care.
4. The citizens don't pay for national healthcare in taxes as of yet.
5. In countries with universal health care The treatment often lacks in quality because this is the government and they like to spend as little as possible.
6. You may see any doctor that you like and get as good of a service that you desire as long as you can afford it.
Which do you prefer?
I'll say this. My mother works at a hospital. Her hospital has thrown out the medicare system, because it doesn't help profits. So, pretend that this was actually a close down of a hospital. The patience that could potentially go to the hospital my mother has to go to one other that excepts medicare or for our purposes, the remaining hospitals. Well, there isn't that much, and therefore, it's not enough. So, one must wait in line. If one is sickly and can't last they might die or be so severe that they will die. Some if they get there might be pushed back for better patients. I've seen this one done before. They do it, so the better patient can have a better chance to live. Well, so there you have it. Have our current health care system and spend a bit more. So individuals have to potentially get aid in finances, which isn't all that negative as the private sector will hhelp, and get a system that all can live if they seek help or die in the universal health care because of the long cues.
All countries except U.S.: Good
1. more folks recieve medical care, but have to wait in long lines.
2. health care is free of charge.
3. In a way, It's fairer.
4. The treatment often lacks in quality because this is the government you are talking about and they like to spend as little as possible.
U.S.: good
1. Ill individuals doesn't have to wait in line, but not everyone receive health care
2. Because of national health care people rush to the states for operations and medical attention.
3. The government doesn't dictate your life and health care.
4. The citizens don't pay for national healthcare in taxes as of yet.
5. In countries with universal health care The treatment often lacks in quality because this is the government and they like to spend as little as possible.
6. You may see any doctor that you like and get as good of a service that you desire as long as you can afford it.
Which do you prefer?
I'll say this. My mother works at a hospital. Her hospital has thrown out the medicare system, because it doesn't help profits. So, pretend that this was actually a close down of a hospital. The patience that could potentially go to the hospital my mother has to go to one other that excepts medicare or for our purposes, the remaining hospitals. Well, there isn't that much, and therefore, it's not enough. So, one must wait in line. If one is sickly and can't last they might die or be so severe that they will die. Some if they get there might be pushed back for better patients. I've seen this one done before. They do it, so the better patient can have a better chance to live. Well, so there you have it. Have our current health care system and spend a bit more. So individuals have to potentially get aid in finances, which isn't all that negative as the private sector will hhelp, and get a system that all can live if they seek help or die in the universal health care because of the long cues.